(432) 367-4928 contact@flexbarinc.com
Products Technical Papers Find a Distributor Contact Us Contact Us
Analysis shows Flexbar Sinkerbars can...
… Increase Production — 21.2%
… Increase Efficiency — 9.2%
… Decrease Rod Loading — 14.4%
Request a FREE copy of this paper.  

Comparative Analysis
Scott W. Long, P.E., SPE and Donald W. Bennett, SPE, Flexbar, Inc.

This analysis is based on an actual application installed by a major oil company in February 1988. Actual data gathered substantiates these predictives.

  ALL STEEL GLASS/
STEEL
GLASS/
SINKERBAR
Design
Sucker Rod String Design API 87 1.25" glass
1" steel rod
1.25" glass
1.625" sinker
Percent Taper 36%/64% 60%/40% 79%/21%
Constant Factors - identical numbers were used for Depth, Pumping Unit, Prime Mover, Stroke Length, Pumping Speed, Pump Size, and Pump Intake Pressure.
Production
Production (BBL/day) 916 963 1110
Increase --- 5.1% 21.2%
Efficiency
Power Required (HP) 70.3 72.3 78.0
Efficiency (BBL/HP) 13.03 13.32 14.231
Increase --- 2.2%
9.2%
Rod Loading
Unit Torque (in balance-x1000 in./lbs.) 630.5 594.9 602.0
Percent of Rating 98.5% 93.0% 94.1%
Peak Polish Rod Load 25,938 22,387 22,979
Min. Polish Rod Load 4,322 2,837 3,324
Rod Loading (%) * 104% 91% 89%
Buoyant Rod Weight 10,404 7,262 9,179

* Class D Rods @ 1.0 Service Factor

Conclusions

Fiberglass/Sinkerbar Design VS API Steel Design

Efficiency 9.2% Increase
Production 21.2% Increase
Rod Loading 14.4% Decrease

Fiberglass/Sinkerbar Design VS Fiberglass/Steel Rod Design

Efficiency 9.1% Increase
Production 13.2% Increase
Rod Loading 2.2% Decrease

Flexbar Sinkerbars and fiberglass sucker rods can produce more fluid more efficiently in many cases. Let us help you design a better rod string today!

Request This Paper
To request a free copy of this paper please use our Request Form and/or to find out more information please Contact Us.